What is PEP According to FATF?
3 Types of Political Exposed Persons Defined By FATF
PEP Risk Levels Based on FATF Guidelines of Red Flags
- Supranational or international business officials, senior functionaries
- Mayors and local, state district, and urban assemblies members.
- Head officials of judiciaries, banks, military, law enforcement
- Senior members of state agencies
- High-ranked civil servants and religious organizations
- Heads and government members
- Parliament members
- Head officials of judiciaries, banks, law enforcement, military and religious organizations
- Prominent political party members.
Red Flags to Watch out for in FATFFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) has introduced red flags of Political Exposed Persons to help corporations detect illegal activities. Several of these indicators should raise some suspicions based on their information matching. In some cases, it might even lead to PEP money laundering. Additionally, a particular nation or state may also have indicators for suspicion that must be considered crucial.
- Assigning legal ownership to somebody
- Abnormally or constantly interacting with intermediaries
- Using corporate vehicles without valid business reasons or for confusing involved ownership and industries
- Being secretive or uncomfortable about the source of funds and wealth
- Providing false, inaccurate, or insufficient information
- The information doesn't match with publicly available data
- Eagerness to explain the reason behind their business in the country's DNFBP or financial institution
- PEP has been denied an entry visa
- Funds belonging to PEP move from one country to another
- A steady flow of wire transfers or cash out
- No credible explanations or details for certain business relationships, transactions
- Access, authority, and control over the corporation's funds, operations, and policies
- Informal/formal ability to control mechanisms against TF/ML
- Influence/control over government or corporate accounts
- Having authority or ownership over DNFBP for financial institutions.
The Industry: Industries are considered high-risk depending on the place, and the risks vary from nation to nation.
- Banking and finance
- Military and defense
- Businesses that work with the government or state agencies
- Construction; Mining and extraction
- Public goods provision
Check Out our website to discover more insights
FCA's Finalised Guidance for PEPs - Round-Up
FCA clarifies its PEP's manual on how companies should use PEP definitions in MLRs in the UK context.
PEP Screening Compliance by Region
PEP Screening compliance has some differences according to countries. Would you like to learn about requirements of your region?
Why PEP Screening Is Important for Business?
Approximately $ 1 trillion in bribes are processed each year, and the amount of corruption is estimated at almost 2.6 trillion. These numbers have serious implications, so financial institutions prevent these crimes.
- The account shows ongoing activity in a short period after a long period
- Private banking demands
- Wire transfers without economic explanation or lacking beneficiary information
- Anonymous payments or transactions received from an unknown third party
- Funds are moved constantly from one account to another or between financial institutions without a business rationale
- Steady cashflows, massive global funds transfers, or wire transfers
- Having and using multiple bank accounts without an apparent reason
- Businesses are catering to foreign clients
- Service and trust providers
- Concentration/correspondent accounts
- Real estate
- Dealers in high-value transport vehicles like ships, sports cars, planes, and helicopters
- Dealers invaluable stones, metals, and luxury goods
- Domestic or foreign high-risk country.
- A country with a high risk of corruption.
- Countries with mono-economies.
- A country that did not sign a relevant anti-corruption convention like the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention and the UNCAC.
Changes in PEP Status
Over the years, there have been several changes to the PEP status and how it is perceived by governments and financial institutions worldwide. One of the most notable changes in the PEP status is the way in which it is now defined. Initially, the term was used to describe only senior government officials and their immediate family members. However, this definition has since been expanded to include individuals who hold prominent positions in international organizations, as well as their close associates. This change was made to reflect the evolving nature of the global economy, where non-governmental organizations and international institutions wield significant power and influence. By broadening the definition of PEPs, governments and financial institutions can better identify and mitigate potential risks associated with money laundering and corruption.
Another significant change in the PEP status is the way in which it is now being monitored. Previously, governments and financial institutions relied primarily on self-disclosure by PEPs to identify their status. However, this approach was often ineffective, as some PEPs may have chosen to hide their status or failed to disclose it accurately.
Today, governments and financial institutions have access to sophisticated databases and screening tools that allow them to identify PEPs more accurately. This approach has significantly enhanced the ability of financial institutions to detect potential money laundering and corruption risks associated with PEPs.
In addition to these changes, there has been a shift in the way that governments and financial institutions treat PEPs. Previously, PEPs were often viewed as high-risk customers who needed to be closely monitored to ensure that they were not involved in illegal activities. However, this approach has shifted in recent years, with many governments and financial institutions recognizing the valuable role that PEPs can play in promoting economic growth and development. Today, many financial institutions offer specialized services and products designed to meet the unique needs of PEPs, such as enhanced due diligence and risk management tools. These services are designed to help PEPs navigate the complex regulatory environment and maintain compliance with anti-money laundering and anti-corruption laws.
Despite these changes, the PEP status remains a complex and evolving concept. As governments and financial institutions continue to refine their approach to identifying and monitoring PEPs, it is likely that further changes will be made in the years to come. However, one thing is clear: the PEP status will continue to play a critical role in the fight against money laundering and corruption, ensuring that individuals who hold positions of power and influence are held accountable for their actions.
Why is PEP Screening Important?
Comply PEP Regulations with Sanction Scanner?
Sanction Scanner provides solutions compatible with global and local AML Regulations. You can check our products for Sanctions, PEP lists, Adverse Media Screening to protect your company from criminal activities.
Click here to contact us for more information